"aidid" 'in aktiviteleri

Hi,

Thanks for the suggestion and it appears to be great :). Just another question thought, Is it better to use a domain service to call the rest api or create a singleton instead?

Base on the screenshot above,

What is the way to fix it or is it coming in future update?

For number 1,

[DependsOn( typeof(AbpAutofacModule), typeof(AbpIdentityHttpApiModule), typeof(AbpIdentityHttpApiClientModule), typeof(ProductManagementHttpApiModule), typeof(AbpEntityFrameworkCoreSqlServerModule), typeof(AbpPermissionManagementEntityFrameworkCoreModule), typeof(AbpPermissionManagementApplicationModule), typeof(AbpPermissionManagementHttpApiModule), typeof(AbpSettingManagementEntityFrameworkCoreModule), typeof(BloggingApplicationContractsModule), typeof(AbpPermissionManagementDomainIdentityModule), typeof(AbpPermissionManagementDomainIdentityServerModule), typeof(AbpHttpClientIdentityModelWebModule), typeof(AbpTenantManagementApplicationContractsModule), typeof(AbpTenantManagementHttpApiModule), typeof(AbpTenantManagementHttpApiClientModule), typeof(AbpTenantManagementEntityFrameworkCoreModule), typeof(AbpFeatureManagementEntityFrameworkCoreModule), typeof(AbpFeatureManagementApplicationModule), typeof(AbpFeatureManagementHttpApiModule), typeof(AbpAspNetCoreMvcUiMultiTenancyModule) )]

There are multiple EFCoreModule references, is it really required?

For number 2, 

That is acceptable answers

Hi,

1. For the gateway that reroute the request from the host to microservice, why does in sample project the database module is depended on. Do we have to depend on database module as well?

2. Is there any plan on writing a better documentation on Microservice architecture considering abp.io promoted microservice as one of it functionality

Hi,

Any help regarding this issue would be appreciated