Aktivity „ElifKaya“
Hi,
We have a 2 different module and we used Kafka in only one. The module which has Kafka integration is attached as a reference in the other console application. But, we also used IDistributedEventHandler in console app. So, when we trigger IDistributedEventHandler on console application, it needs running Kafka server because of dependencies.
So, We need to Kafka enabled false/true something like bellow in console application
Can you give an advice? Thanks,
ABP Framework version: v5.1.1
UI type: MVC
DB provider: EF Core
Tiered (MVC): yes
Exception message and stack trace:
Steps to reproduce the issue:"
Hello,
We publish message to Kafka by using IDistributedEventBus PublishAsync method. If Kafka is not running, application throw exception as "An internal error occurred during your request!". But we have to complete request even if Kafka is not running. We try that using AbpEventBusOptions but we can not find 5.1.1 version. How can handle this exception using ABP Framework.
ABP Framework version: v5.1.1
UI type: MVC
DB provider: EF Core
Tiered (MVC): yes
Exception message and stack trace:
Steps to reproduce the issue:"
Hi,
In this way, the background job system has been disabled, Job handlers will not execute anymore.
Yes, when I set this property as a False, Job handlers does not execute. But, I could send my message to RabbitMq and then show its details. When I use as a True, I can not push my message in RabbitMq. Why can't I push a message while the BackgroundJob is still running? Can you share a working sample code with me?
Hi,
I guess it is already handled by the job handler
I solved this problem with below BackgroundJobs config. Does this solution affect the operation of the jogs that we will use outside of rabbitmq in the future? Thanks
The point is Job arg class must have a no-argument constructor, It can also have other constructors
Now, I understand what you mean, thank you : ) But, when I add to no-argument constructor, message can not be pushed "unacked" or "ready", it never pushed. If I remove no-argument constructor, I can show my message just "Unaked" state.
I saw an example constructor with parameters on Volo.ABP solution.
Hi,
Sorry, I didn't get it, can you explain it in detail?
I used AbpRabbitMqOptions to connect RabbitMq and also used AbpRabbitMqBackgroundJobOptions to push my message. I can connect RabbitMQ side and push my messages. But these message is "Unacked" state on queues. I should see "Ready" state.
In the last example highlighted in red below, you can see that it remains "Unacked". There is no problem when I give my own integration directly to RabbitMq without using ABP integration. But when I use ABP, the status stays "Unacked" on runtime. It should be "Ready". When I stop debugging on Visual Studio, it goes into Ready state. This issue only happens when I use ABP integration.
I found a similar issue to this here. But this solution didn't work for me. https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/7066
Hi,
Queues can not be moved from "unacked" to "ready" when I use AbpRabbitMqBackgroundJobOptions.
And also, I tried this from this link https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/7066. But it doesn't work.
options.Connections.Default = new ConnectionFactory() { DispatchConsumersAsync = true }; // the result did not change ???
Can you explain this problem, please?
Thanks,
Check the docs before asking a question: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/ Check the samples, to see the basic tasks: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/samples/index The exact solution to your question may have been answered before, please use the search on the homepage.
If you're creating a bug/problem report, please include followings:
ABP Framework version: v5.1.1
UI type: / MVC /
DB provider: EF Core
Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes / no
Exception message and stack trace:
Steps to reproduce the issue:"
Hi,
I tried this example from https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/4.4/Distributed-Event-Bus-RabbitMQ-Integration. And I want to add exchange type as a Topic Exchange and also I want to add a Routing Key. How can I do this by ABP Framework options or something like that?
Thanks,
Check the docs before asking a question: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/ Check the samples, to see the basic tasks: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/samples/index The exact solution to your question may have been answered before, please use the search on the homepage.
If you're creating a bug/problem report, please include followings:
ABP Framework version: v5.1.1
UI type: / MVC /
DB provider: EF Core
Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes / no
Exception message and stack trace:
Steps to reproduce the issue:"
Hi,
When we use select2 dynamical option create on abp-modal with ABP Framework 4.3.3, we had no problem and we were able to use it for a long time.
After we upgrated ABP version to 5.1.1. We have a problem about select2 enabled on abp-modal. But it works on normal page, it doesn't work on the abp-modal only.
Then, we tried to use bootstrap modal instead of abp_modal on the same solution (.net6 and abp V5.1.1) and it worked.
But we don't want to use bootstrap modal instead of abp-modal. I shared some code blocks and UI screenshots. Can you help about this problem?
Thanks for the advice.
This is a successful example for V4.3.3
Same example for V5.1.1 with an error
Same example for bootstrap modal instead of abp_modal
Thanks,
Check the docs before asking a question: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/ Check the samples, to see the basic tasks: https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/samples/index The exact solution to your question may have been answered before, please use the search on the homepage.
If you're creating a bug/problem report, please include followings:
- ABP Framework version: v5.1.1
- UI type: / MVC /
- DB provider: EF Core
- Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes / no
- Exception message and stack trace:
- Steps to reproduce the issue:"