Activities of "GerryGe"
Added to the internal work plan.
Hi, Thanks. Before I raised this issue, I have asked myself what the purpose of your examples is. I think you cannot cover specific business logic, because different customers have different requests. So I think the purpose of your samples especially commercial examplea are:
- Learn your best practices
- Learn your design
The above is my opinion, if there is an error, please correct it.
Best regards.
Hi, I cannot agree with you. This is an official commercial example! As describe in your documents, It is a good application for a real life scenario.
Other examples are very sample, only this one is close to the production. I strongly hope that you can provide an example totally follow best practices which you have summarized.
Do you have any plans to refactor this example? I think it will be a better service for a business user.
I would like to know is there a clear time/plan to complete this feature? Now ABP is tightly coupled with IdentityServer and it's not as simple to switch to other providers. We would suggest it's completely redesigned so ABP supports different Oauth providers. Our business users always concerning about the identity server future and want to switch to they own idp. Now I see the the task #7221 in 5.3-preview milestone. Is this feature determined to be completed at Milestone 5.3-preview this time? Won't it move to another milestones at the last minute? Because I'll arrange our schedue according this feature. Can you help to comfim? Best regards.
I have queries about the commercial easycrm sample.
Take ProductGroup and Product for example, there are both aggregate root.
As saied in book <<Implementing_Domain_Driven_Design>>:
But as you can see in EasyCrm sample, ProductGroup have a collection of the Products, and Product have a navigation property for the ProductGroup.
Above is just one sample doesn't follow the book. Actully, there are many places. I would like to know why not follow the best practices? Do you have any good reasons? if not, can you refactor these code? And this sample always upgrade delayed. Now still in v5.0.0.