Activities of "steve.burgess"

• ABP Framework version: v7.0.1
• UI type: Angular
• DB provider: EF Core
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:"

Hi,

It appears the the scroll event is being suppressed. This has start happening since upgrading to 7.0.1 and LeptonX.

It looks like it related to the virtual scrollbar that's been added.

Is there anyway to remove the virtual scrollbar or hook into its scroll events?

Cheers,

Steve.

• ABP Framework version: v7.0.1
• UI type: Angularr
• DB provider: EF Core
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:"

Hi,

I'm currently using the microservice template.

After upgrading to version 7, updates to the translation files are not appearing in the application.

After updating the translation file and starting the application i can see the new changes correctly being added to the AbpLocalizationTexts table. However, when you start the application and it fetches the localizations from "api/abp/application-localization?cultureName=en&onlyDynamics=false" it returns the old version of the file.

Looking in redis it doesn't look like the cache has been updated with the new values.

Am i missing something? Is there something new i need to be doing in v7?

Thanks,

Steve.

• ABP Framework version: v7.0.1
• UI type: Angular
• DB provider: EF Core
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:"

Hi, I'm currently using the microservice template for one of my projects. I had quick question about swagger and the Web Gateway.

The diagram at the top of this page (https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/startup-templates/microservice/gateways) show the web applications (in my case Angular) connecting to the services through the Web Gateway.

In my Openshift configuration im planning on setting it so the services are only accessible via the Web Gateway as this seems to make sense.

However, this looks like it will break the swagger page on the Web Gateway. As far as i can tell when selecting an option from the top right drop down on the Web Gateway swagger page your browser will attempt to contact the selected service and pull down its swagger definition. This obviously fails if you have restricted access to the service to be just through the Web Gateway.

Am i misunderstanding something or is this how it's meant to be?

Thanks,

Steve.

• ABP Framework version: v6.0.3
• UI type: Angular
• DB provider: EF Core
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes (Microservice template)
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:"

Hi,

I'd like to just check that i'm doing login redirection correctly in abp v6 Angular Lepton-x.

When you log out of the Angular frontend it calls authserver/connect/logout

This looks like it ends up calling the OpenIddict Logout controller here https://github.com/abpframework/abp/blob/cc54b34f2777dae7697b92ea47c2c424e089632f/modules/openiddict/src/Volo.Abp.OpenIddict.AspNetCore/Volo/Abp/OpenIddict/Controllers/LogoutController.cs

Am i right in saying that by default when logging out via the logout menu (shown below) in the Angular frontend you will always get redirected to the root of your Angular site?

I believe this is correct because in the Logout Controller a new AuthenticationProperties object is created and the redirectUri is set to "/"

This redirection is allowed because the OpenIddict data seed adds localhost to the PostLogoutRedirectUris for the Angular application in the database.

Am i correct in thinking that if i want to change the page that is redirected to after logging out i need to update the PostLogoutRedirectUris field in the database and also then update the Logout call in the frontend to pass the "post_logout_redirect_uri" parameter as below:

authService.logout({"post_logout_redirect_uri": "http://localhost:4200/somepage"}).subscribe()

Is the above correct? Or should i be doing this another way?

Thanks,

Steve.

• ABP Framework version: v6.0.3
• UI type: Angular
• DB provider: EF Core
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes (OpenIddict)
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:"

Hi,

I'm trying to figure out how to remove items from the "General Settings" menu in the Angular lepton-x theme without replacing the component.

This section

Is this possible?

Thanks,

Steve.

• ABP Framework version: v5.3.4
• UI type: Angular
• DB provider: EF Core
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes (microservice template)
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:"

Hi, i'm struggling to diagnose an intermittent issue i'm having during e2e testing.

Seemingly at random requests to api/abp/application-configuration will fail with the below error. I've had a look through the configuration fetching code on Github and as far as i can tell we're not updating anything that would be causing this error.

Any ideas?

[10:52:05 INF] Executing endpoint 'Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.ApplicationConfigurations.AbpApplicationConfigurationController.GetAsync (Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc)' [10:52:05 INF] Route matched with {area = "abp", action = "Get", controller = "AbpApplicationConfiguration", page = ""}. Executing controller action with signature System.Threading.Tasks.Task1[Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.ApplicationConfigurations.ApplicationConfigurationDto] GetAsync() on controller Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.ApplicationConfigurations.AbpApplicationConfigurationController (Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc). [10:52:05 WRN] The cookie 'XSRF-TOKEN' has set 'SameSite=None' and must also set 'Secure'. [10:52:05 ERR] ---------- RemoteServiceErrorInfo ---------- { "code": null, "message": "An internal error occurred during your request!", "details": null, "data": {}, "validationErrors": null }

[10:52:05 ERR] Operations that change non-concurrent collections must have exclusive access. A concurrent update was performed on this collection and corrupted its state. The collection's state is no longer correct. System.InvalidOperationException: Operations that change non-concurrent collections must have exclusive access. A concurrent update was performed on this collection and corrupted its state. The collection's state is no longer correct. at System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2.TryInsert(TKey key, TValue value, InsertionBehavior behavior) at System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2.set_Item(TKey key, TValue value) at Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection.AbpLazyServiceProvider.LazyGetService(Type serviceType) at Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection.AbpLazyServiceProvider.LazyGetService(Type serviceType, Object defaultValue) at Volo.Abp.DependencyInjection.AbpLazyServiceProvider.LazyGetService[T](T defaultValue) at Volo.Abp.Domain.Repositories.BasicRepositoryBase1.get_CancellationTokenProvider() at Volo.Abp.Domain.Repositories.BasicRepositoryBase1.GetCancellationToken(CancellationToken preferredValue) at Volo.Abp.PermissionManagement.EntityFrameworkCore.EfCorePermissionGrantRepository.GetListAsync(String[] names, String providerName, String providerKey, CancellationToken cancellationToken) at Castle.DynamicProxy.AsyncInterceptorBase.ProceedAsynchronous[TResult](IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo) at Volo.Abp.Castle.DynamicProxy.CastleAbpMethodInvocationAdapterWithReturnValue1.ProceedAsync() at Volo.Abp.Uow.UnitOfWorkInterceptor.InterceptAsync(IAbpMethodInvocation invocation) at Volo.Abp.Castle.DynamicProxy.CastleAsyncAbpInterceptorAdapter1.InterceptAsync[TResult](IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo, Func3 proceed) at Volo.Abp.PermissionManagement.PermissionStore.SetCacheItemsAsync(String providerName, String providerKey, List1 notCacheKeys) at Volo.Abp.PermissionManagement.PermissionStore.GetCacheItemsAsync(String[] names, String providerName, String providerKey) at Volo.Abp.PermissionManagement.PermissionStore.IsGrantedAsync(String[] names, String providerName, String providerKey) at Volo.Abp.Authorization.Permissions.ClientPermissionValueProvider.CheckAsync(PermissionValuesCheckContext context) at Volo.Abp.Authorization.Permissions.PermissionChecker.IsGrantedAsync(ClaimsPrincipal claimsPrincipal, String[] names) at Volo.Abp.Authorization.Permissions.PermissionChecker.IsGrantedAsync(String[] names) at Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.ApplicationConfigurations.AbpApplicationConfigurationAppService.GetAuthConfigAsync() at Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.ApplicationConfigurations.AbpApplicationConfigurationAppService.GetAsync() at Castle.DynamicProxy.AsyncInterceptorBase.ProceedAsynchronous[TResult](IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo) at Volo.Abp.Castle.DynamicProxy.CastleAbpMethodInvocationAdapterWithReturnValue1.ProceedAsync() at Volo.Abp.GlobalFeatures.GlobalFeatureInterceptor.InterceptAsync(IAbpMethodInvocation invocation) at Volo.Abp.Castle.DynamicProxy.CastleAsyncAbpInterceptorAdapter1.InterceptAsync[TResult](IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo, Func3 proceed) at Castle.DynamicProxy.AsyncInterceptorBase.ProceedAsynchronous[TResult](IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo) at Volo.Abp.Castle.DynamicProxy.CastleAbpMethodInvocationAdapterWithReturnValue1.ProceedAsync() at Volo.Abp.Auditing.AuditingInterceptor.ProceedByLoggingAsync(IAbpMethodInvocation invocation, IAuditingHelper auditingHelper, IAuditLogScope auditLogScope) at Volo.Abp.Auditing.AuditingInterceptor.InterceptAsync(IAbpMethodInvocation invocation) at Volo.Abp.Castle.DynamicProxy.CastleAsyncAbpInterceptorAdapter1.InterceptAsync[TResult](IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo, Func3 proceed) at Castle.DynamicProxy.AsyncInterceptorBase.ProceedAsynchronous[TResult](IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo) at Volo.Abp.Castle.DynamicProxy.CastleAbpMethodInvocationAdapterWithReturnValue1.ProceedAsync() at Volo.Abp.Validation.ValidationInterceptor.InterceptAsync(IAbpMethodInvocation invocation) at Volo.Abp.Castle.DynamicProxy.CastleAsyncAbpInterceptorAdapter1.InterceptAsync[TResult](IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo, Func3 proceed) at Castle.DynamicProxy.AsyncInterceptorBase.ProceedAsynchronous[TResult](IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo) at Volo.Abp.Castle.DynamicProxy.CastleAbpMethodInvocationAdapterWithReturnValue1.ProceedAsync() at Volo.Abp.Uow.UnitOfWorkInterceptor.InterceptAsync(IAbpMethodInvocation invocation) at Volo.Abp.Castle.DynamicProxy.CastleAsyncAbpInterceptorAdapter1.InterceptAsync[TResult](IInvocation invocation, IInvocationProceedInfo proceedInfo, Func3 proceed) at Volo.Abp.AspNetCore.Mvc.ApplicationConfigurations.AbpApplicationConfigurationController.GetAsync() at lambda_method1417(Closure , Object ) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ActionMethodExecutor.AwaitableObjectResultExecutor.Execute(IActionResultTypeMapper mapper, ObjectMethodExecutor executor, Object controller, Object[] arguments) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.<InvokeActionMethodAsync>g__Awaited|12_0(ControllerActionInvoker invoker, ValueTask1 actionResultValueTask) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.<InvokeNextActionFilterAsync>g__Awaited|10_0(ControllerActionInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.Rethrow(ActionExecutedContextSealed context) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.Next(State& next, Scope& scope, Object& state, Boolean& isCompleted) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.<InvokeInnerFilterAsync>g__Awaited|13_0(ControllerActionInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.<InvokeNextExceptionFilterAsync>g__Awaited|26_0(ResourceInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted) [10:52:05 INF] Executing ObjectResult, writing value of type 'Volo.Abp.Http.RemoteServiceErrorResponse'.

Thanks,

Steve.

• ABP Framework version: v5.3.4
• UI type: Angular
• DB provider: EF Core
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:"

Hi, i'm currently using the microservice template using Azure openId connect as the authentication provider. I've just upgraded to 5.3.4. As part of the upgrade a number of endpoints have been moved under the new Account Service.

After the upgrade users attempting to edit their profile information receive an error message. I'm assuming this is because their auth token doesn't contain a claim for the Account Service. This is easily solved by having the user log off and back on, however i was wondering if there is a way to force all currently logged in users to have to reauthenticate?

Thanks,

Steve.

• ABP Framework version: v5.3.4
• UI type: Angular
• DB provider: EF Core
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:"

Hi, i'm seeing CORS errors in the log files for the 5.3.4 microservice template. This is happening for all of the services.

It's not causing any issues and everything works as expected, it's just filling the log file with noise as it happens a lot.

The services (saas, administration, identity, product) only have the Web Gateways in there CorsOrigins configuration. The Web Gateways then have the frontend in their CorsOrigin. So when it goes "frontend -> gateway -> service" i assume Ocelot is passing the Origin as the frontend and that's causing the error?

Is there a way around this? Or do i just need to add the frontends to the services CorsOrigins to stop the errors?

Cheers,

Steve.

• ABP Framework version: v5.1.3
• UI type: Angular
• DB provider: EF Core
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes (Microservice template)
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:"

Hi,

I'm currently using the microservice template (v5.1.3)

I'm trying to figure out how to make a custom claim visible to when using CurrentUser.FindClaim in one of my custom services.

I'm using Azure Open Id Connect. The claim is in the returned Id token from Azure as seen below

I'm struggling to understand how to get that to appear as a claim on the currently logged in user.

I followed the instructions in this issue https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/42 but much like piresashwin in the last comment the CreateAsync method of the custom ClaimsPrincipalFactory never appears to be called.

Cheers,

Steve.

• ABP Framework version: 4.4.2
• UI type: Angular
• DB provider: EF Core
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue:"

Hi,

I have a couple of questions around error handling. I currently have an angular frontend with a REST API backend

I’m attempting to disable the default error handling for my APIs in the angular frontend.

It appears that you can pass “skipHandleError: true” to the RestService to achieve this. However, I’m automatically generating the service proxies using the abp suite with “abp generate-proxy”. Is there any way to tell this auto generation to set skipHandleError to true?

I’m also struggling to create a custom 404 page. Are there any examples of how to do this?

Thanks,

Steve.