You can post your feature request under this topic. If other members like the feature, they can upvote☝️ the post. Upvotes will be considered when choosing from feature requests.
Rules of posting to this thread:
- Your post should only contain feature requests. Posts with bug reporting or asking questions will be removed.
- Your feature request must be a generic feature that will be used by most of the ABP developers.
- Your feature request must clearly explain the problem the feature solves.
- If you have multiple feature requests, do not write them in separate posts. Merge all the requests in a single post.
98 Answer(s)
-
2
Bulk SMS and Bulk SMS sending and inbox to users and customers (a new entity) since most abp projects will have a customer entity
-
1
Integration with 3rd party applications module/ framework (background services).
-
5
Export to excel button on abp suite generated pages
-
7
- many-to-many with supporting custom properties in intermediate tables and wilth fully support on abp.suite
- many-to-many UI with generated grids with related entity with options "New", "Update", "Link", "Unlink", "Delete" - example how it could be implemented: https://docs.devexpress.com/eXpressAppFramework/112719/getting-started/in-depth-tutorial-winforms-webforms/business-model-design/business-model-design-with-xpo/set-a-many-to-many-relationship-xpo
-
1
Add example for document attachments of pages i.e sales orders details page you might want to add attachments and store them in a seperate page than file management page.
-
0
To add color PropertyType for fields and with Color Picker with renderer used like jscolor.js
-
0
We pick and prioritize feature requests based on widespread usage by the community. Features that are less usable are either not implemented or assigned low-priority.
-
4
CRUD Generator for type Decimal should cater for scale and precision properties' of a Decimal type.
-
1
Cater for binary and XML type would be good.
-
2
GUID properties type
-
0
GUID properties type
SQL Server has `uniqueidentifier' - or did you mean something else?
-
1
GUID properties type
SQL Server has `uniqueidentifier' - or did you mean something else?
Sorry, in ABP Suite there isn't GUID type in "Define property" mask
-
4
Make use of css variables in themes so that it is changeable with reasonable effort. Taking the lepton theme as an example: I need to set my own colors so that they match my corporate identity.
Starting from lepton6.css (copied from source into my project) I have one screen with the app running, another with debug console and another with the css file. I need to check the hex codes used to then manipulate the style sheet, which is WAY more effort than just replacing a bunch of variables. And now that I replaced everything with variables I am less exited about updates in this area, because I now have to constantly monitor changes >.<
-
7
ABP Suite - Preserve Custom Code Across Repeated CRUD Generations
my common work-flow: generate crud->customise->re-generate crud->re-enter-previous customization-> repeat...etc
- for the *.cs generated classes is would be very useful to be able to wrap custom code in a region - such that the CRUD engine can detect this region in the *.cs file allowing it to be preserved across CRUD generations.
`#region CustomCode
// ...custom code here
#endregion`
This would be a massive boost in efficiency and a valued Feature in my opinion.
-
6
ABP Suite - Preserve Custom Code Across Repeated CRUD Generations
my common work-flow: generate crud->customise->re-generate crud->re-enter-previous customization-> repeat...etc
- for the *.cs generated classes is would be very useful to be able to wrap custom code in a region - such that the CRUD engine can detect this region in the *.cs file allowing it to be preserved across CRUD generations.
`#region CustomCode
// ...custom code here
#endregion`
This would be a massive boost in efficiency and a valued Feature in my opinion.
this is one of the important features that we would like to implement. there are several approaches to preserving the custom code. we will find the best way to achieve this.
-
0
Add Parameter for Microservice to specify mongodb as dbms
Make it possible to change dbms after creation of solution . p.E from sql to postgres or mongo
Add Document howto add a standard template pro project into a microservice solution as service
-
2
CRUD Generation - allow the option to select one or more Properties to become part of a Unique Constraint.
This is a very common requirement across the projects I've worked on and although it can be enforced in other layers - I think having these constraints at the DB layer is best practice for a strong system.
Example: EF SQL Server multi-tenant app - generated code might look something like:
-
5
Built-in abp upgrade system, maybe using partial class or virtual methods for customer's customizations.
No more file compare with windiff or git compare
-
0
context independent version of SetDefaultRepositoryClasses ( to replace EfCoreRepository for the whole project )
-
5
- many-to-many with supporting custom properties in intermediate tables and wilth fully support on abp.suite
- many-to-many UI with generated grids with related entity with options "New", "Update", "Link", "Unlink", "Delete" - example how it
Of course we need this !!!
In my humble opinion, it is like a standard basic feature that is missing. Almost all applications needs this, being able to add child records with multiple values/columns. And most, if not all, application template builder from the past 25 years has this kind of features. I'm really surprised that this is not already there in ABP Suite.
Actual 1-to-many or many-to-many feature should allow us, at least, to choose more than one field to be the "display property". We should be able to order them and pick the separator characte. Being able to enter something like a "format template", instead of a drop down list, would be good: E.g. {Name} - {Value} (Comments).
ID should be one of the available field to be picked as Display Property, especially if you choose it to be something else than a GUID (meaning that it is human readable/usable).
When creating a 1-to-many relation, an option should allow us to create the reverse relation at the same time.
-
1
implement ConcurrencyLimiter / RateLimiter / PartitionedRateLimiter with underlying entities for collecting data and configurations per tenant / per user / per token
-
1
ALL Pro modules for Blazor Server / WASM
-
1
Basic commercial license less expensive with only Pro module license without ABP SUITE.
-
0
ABP Suite
the word "running" - as in 'a process that is running' - might be better than "working" in this message context.
-
0
Export to excel button on abp suite generated pages
Hey this feature is now available and can be tested with ABP v6.0.0-rc.1! https://blog.abp.io/abp/ABP.IO-Platform-6.0-RC-Has-Been-Published
-
-1
- many-to-many with supporting custom properties in intermediate tables and wilth fully support on abp.suite
- many-to-many UI with generated grids with related entity with options "New", "Update", "Link", "Unlink", "Delete" - example how it could be implemented: https://docs.devexpress.com/eXpressAppFramework/112719/getting-started/in-depth-tutorial-winforms-webforms/business-model-design/business-model-design-with-xpo/set-a-many-to-many-relationship-xpo
Many to many is implemented in ABP Suite.
-
0
Make use of css variables in themes so that it is changeable with reasonable effort. Taking the lepton theme as an example: I need to set my own colors so that they match my corporate identity.
Starting from lepton6.css (copied from source into my project) I have one screen with the app running, another with debug console and another with the css file. I need to check the hex codes used to then manipulate the style sheet, which is WAY more effort than just replacing a bunch of variables. And now that I replaced everything with variables I am less exited about updates in this area, because I now have to constantly monitor changes >.<
CMS kit has a feature to write your custom Css without even opening the solution. Just from the UI , runtime ! https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Modules/Cms-Kit/Global-Resources
-
0
ABP Suite
the word "running" - as in 'a process that is running' - might be better than "working" in this message context.
This checks if we get Http-200 successful result from the running service. It is not checking the if the process is running.
-
0
Hi,
to be able to participate with speed of development at community site of abp it would be great if you could implement a parameter "upgrade-to-pro" for abp cli. The abp cli would use the free available examples as base and could upgrade them to a commercial version. That way a paying customer we would have a great effort. !
This would work like this (for example on eshoponabp):
- Clone free eshoponabp from Github
- Upgrade to commercial modules , adding abp pro specific modules etc ( like the current microservice-template-pro)
-
0
I do really like your docker and tye integration. This works great. But i don't like your kubernetes integration so far. i did face a lot of issues, and still have some.
To improve that for future:
Please implement with every new release a test in which you ensure that the charts/templates/values fit your new code version. That way you can catch up errors that only error during kubernetes execution. For us as cutomer you would deliver a more stable reliable product.
Edit: Example: Together with my post before you could implement that as new Task for the commercial part in your eshoponabp github repo
-
0
ABP Suite
the word "running" - as in 'a process that is running' - might be better than "working" in this message context.
This checks if we get Http-200 successful result from the running service. It is not checking the if the process is running.
hmm, i think the point is being missed here - the message is not clear and confuses some users causing them to raise questions. some simple re-wording might help but I can only suggest.
-
2
Domain.{Entity}Manager.cs
Recently the Create and Update task was moved into the Manager.cs and this was a nice improvement. The Delete was not moved to the manager. It remains in the application layer.
I would like to see the Delete moved here as well.
Reasons include:
- Consistency in approach
- There are times when additional logic is to be executed on the a Delete and the Doman Manager is the right place to do this
-
0
Feature Request : Custom HTTPS Responses for AppServices
I would like the ability to customize my AppServices and be able to specify exactly what HTTP Status code gets returned by a particular response in order to better integrate the with external APIs using industry standard conventions. For example, the one that always bites is when the system sends an HTTP200 response when the user needs to authenticate.
I am not sure how this would look in implementation, but it would go a long way towards making the framework more extensible and integratable, in my opinion.
-
0
Feature Request : Custom HTTPS Responses for AppServices
I would like the ability to customize my AppServices and be able to specify exactly what HTTP Status code gets returned by a particular response in order to better integrate the with external APIs using industry standard conventions. For example, the one that always bites is when the system sends an HTTP200 response when the user needs to authenticate.
I am not sure how this would look in implementation, but it would go a long way towards making the framework more extensible and integratable, in my opinion.
Did you check out https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Exception-Handling#http-status-code-mapping
-
0
Feature Request : Custom HTTPS Responses for AppServices
I would like the ability to customize my AppServices and be able to specify exactly what HTTP Status code gets returned by a particular response in order to better integrate the with external APIs using industry standard conventions. For example, the one that always bites is when the system sends an HTTP200 response when the user needs to authenticate.
I am not sure how this would look in implementation, but it would go a long way towards making the framework more extensible and integratable, in my opinion.
Did you check out https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Exception-Handling#http-status-code-mapping
I had not seen that, thank you! I will check it out.
-
1
Please enable creating Multi-Lingual Entity using abp suite
-
0
The fact that adding a many to many relationship that does not respect the schema of the parent table is absolutely a bug; opposed to your statement that it is not here
https://support.abp.io/QA/Questions/3381/BUG--CRUD-Generator-when-creating-a-Many-Many-table-does-not-respect-the-schema-name-of-the-app
debating using schemas aside, does this really look like good database design to you?
-
0
now I have a dilemma a real dilemma, do I really build out my database with this terrible design, or do I scrap the whole thing. entirely unacceptable
modifying the migration file works fine but then the UI blows up
-
0
more proper, I think anyone would have to agree. not?
If this is not something you're going to fix, can you give some guidance on where to fix it?
-
2
With Blazor comming close to build once - run everywhere with MAUI and Blazor Hybrid, wouldn't it be nice with just one "Blazor" template for which you could select which Blazor UIs (WASM, Server, native) you want and then that generated components were but into a Razor Component Library instead?
Perhaps from the start it could just be WASM + Server but with MAUI becoming more mature, perhaps become WASM + Server + MAUI. AFAIK, unless you start using Native controls, the Blazor components themselves and their markup should be very similar regardless of hosting environment.
Not sure what amount of work this would mean, but just floating the idea in general.
This was also posted as https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/13710 and has two votes on there which should count, one of them I believe is from a core team member :)
-
1
Add support for MAUI Blazor (BlazorWebView) in the ABP Suite Mobile Application (don't remember exactly what it is called). MAUI is supported but only as XAML. As I understand it, authentication is supposed to be handled in the XAML even when using mainly Blazor, so the changes needed would probably be quite small.
Authentication in Blazor Hybrid apps is handled by native platform libraries, as they offer enhanced security guarantees that the browser sandbox can't offer. Authentication of native apps uses an OS-specific mechanism or via a federated protocol, such as OpenID Connect (OIDC). Follow the guidance for the identity provider that you've selected for the app and then further integrate identity with Blazor using the guidance in this article.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/blazor/hybrid/security/?view=aspnetcore-6.0&pivots=maui
-
0
Add support for MAUI Blazor (BlazorWebView) in the ABP Suite Mobile Application (don't remember exactly what it is called). MAUI is supported but only as XAML. As I understand it, authentication is supposed to be handled in the XAML even when using mainly Blazor, so the changes needed would probably be quite small.
Authentication in Blazor Hybrid apps is handled by native platform libraries, as they offer enhanced security guarantees that the browser sandbox can't offer. Authentication of native apps uses an OS-specific mechanism or via a federated protocol, such as OpenID Connect (OIDC). Follow the guidance for the identity provider that you've selected for the app and then further integrate identity with Blazor using the guidance in this article.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/blazor/hybrid/security/?view=aspnetcore-6.0&pivots=maui
Perhaps a better alternative could be to switch to MAUI Blazor project type instead of a plain MAUI one, since the former support Xaml AND Blazor, while the normal MAUI only supports Xaml and requires quite a bit a configuring to get Blazor working.
Since ABP is primarilly a web framework, it would seem reasonable that anyone using ABP is more likely to use Blazor than XAML, as anyone interested in writing native apps only probably would not be using ABP at all.
-
1
Add the features present in AspNetZero RadTool to Abp Suite as the section "Other" where we can set "Advanced Filter", "List in UI" and "Create and Update".
And, if possible, reduce the number of template files used by Abp Suite also giving the possibility to indicate the sub-path where to save the files as it could be done in AspNetZero RadTool.
Thanks, Roberto
-
0
Add the features present in AspNetZero RadTool to Abp Suite as the section "Other" where we can set "Advanced Filter", "List in UI" and "Create and Update".
And, if possible, reduce the number of template files used by Abp Suite also giving the possibility to indicate the sub-path where to save the files as it could be done in AspNetZero RadTool.
Thanks, Roberto
yes this is on the roadmap , we'll implement it.
-
0
This question has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity.
-
0
Add the features present in AspNetZero RadTool to Abp Suite as the section "Other" where we can set "Advanced Filter", "List in UI" and "Create and Update".
And, if possible, reduce the number of template files used by Abp Suite also giving the possibility to indicate the sub-path where to save the files as it could be done in AspNetZero RadTool.
Thanks,
Robertoyes this is on the roadmap , we'll implement it.
this feature is included in ABP v7.2 release.
-
0
re-activated
-
0
I hope to use ABP Suite to generate Excel export functionality with localized column names, so that there is no need to modify the code again after it's generated.
-
0
CMS Pro module for Blazor Server. It does have the admin stuff, but not able to use the user facing CMS capabilities. Have to put it on a different website as asp.net mvc and that is a no-go. Has to work on the same website/blazor server.
-
0
Suite
- Add db name mappings to suite crud generator.
- Allow import from existing class
Login
- When someone logs in with SSO, display a list of matching tenants and let them click through
- Add required login via google/sso option.
File Manager
- See imagekit https://github.com/imagekit-developer/embeddable-media-library
- I think a popup iframe version makes more sense as you can add it to different widgets, even if you're not using the ABP themes.
-
1
1、增加一个字段说明 1、Add a field description
2、当使用suite生成代码后，dto、entity的summary都加上这个“字段说明” 2. After using suite to generate code, add this "field description" to the summary of dto and entity.
3、还有表（实体）说明，在实体类的summary上显示 3. There are also table (entity) descriptions, which are displayed on the summary of the entity class
-
0
I would like to implement a webhook feature like ASP.NET Zero.
https://docs.aspnetzero.com/en/aspnet-core-mvc/latest/Features-Webhooks
-
0
I would like to implement a webhook feature like ASP.NET Zero.
https://docs.aspnetzero.com/en/aspnet-core-mvc/latest/Features-Webhooks
You can implement this feature on the framework side > https://github.com/abpframework/abp We will be happy to see your PR.
-
0
I would like to implement a webhook feature like ASP.NET Zero.
https://docs.aspnetzero.com/en/aspnet-core-mvc/latest/Features-Webhooks
You can implement this feature on the framework side > https://github.com/abpframework/abp We will be happy to see your PR.
I think @portx-dev was asking you to develop it as a feature of the Abp Commercial version :-)
The requested feature is already on the roadmap https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Road-Map from 2020 https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/4223
-
0
I think @portx-dev was asking you to develop it as a feature of the Abp Commercial version :-)
yes, I want to add webhook for Abp Commercial version!
-
0
Blazor Web Assembly.
- Impersonate Users - So a host user can impersonate a tenant user for support and troubleshooting.
- Remove the redirect requirement for login. We do not want to use the ABP website feature, we want users to go straight to login page, and be redirected to it after logout.
- Improve the speed to load the application, from URL click, and then from Login. There are lots of ways to improve this, a significant one would be the open login page directly.
- Better example of how to integrate SaaS monthly and/one off payment with Stripe (show what stripe settings are used for the example).
- Better example of using AzureAD for validation of tenant users.
-
0
Add SCIM functionality to automate onboarding and offboarding tenant users. This would be part of SSO functionality too. Allow the SCIM to be extended to also set the Role and other application defaults.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/fundamentals/sync-scim
Here is an example of how others do it; https://www.strongdm.com/docs/admin/identity-providers/azure-scim-provisioning
-
0
- Love to see if ABP Suite can generate separate pages for Create and Edit Model.
- When creating a new layered Application via ABP Suite, an option to add all UI (MVC, Blazor, Maui, Angler...) in one go, similar is already possible with Module but not with Application.
- Generate CRUD from Entity Classes
-
4
ABP suite is almost unusable to maintain an application, especialy after a while when modifications has occured in the first version of generated code. Doing a simple update, like adding a new field to an entity, has 95% odds to break the code, the tests, and needs manual file comparisons, fixes and implies a lot of error possibilites.
But, I think that if the first class generated were made using partial class and partial methods... and the code being generated marked by #region block and/or some comments marker like "/* ABPSuite generated code, do not do code change below/above */, then it will make updates possible (and easier to deal with in ABP Suite code generator).
Then, some "inteligence" could be added in the code generatior and start to "update the code", not just restarting from scratch and igoring the changes made by others...
ABP Suite is a nice tool, able to save us A LOT of time, but it misses some features to still be a great value after the initial applcation creation.
-
1
ABP suite is almost unusable to maintain an application, especialy after a while when modifications has occured in the first version of generated code. Doing a simple update, like adding a new field to an entity, has 95% odds to break the code, the tests, and needs manual file comparisons, fixes and implies a lot of error possibilites.
But, I think that if the first class generated were made using partial class and partial methods... and the code being generated marked by #region block and/or some comments marker like "/* ABPSuite generated code, do not do code change below/above */, then it will make updates possible (and easier to deal with in ABP Suite code generator).
Then, some "inteligence" could be added in the code generatior and start to "update the code", not just restarting from scratch and igoring the changes made by others...
ABP Suite is a nice tool, able to save us A LOT of time, but it misses some features to still be a great value after the initial applcation creation.
I totally agree with you Francois... And already created an internal feature issue for this. Not an easy feature to implement but we'll do our best.
-
1
Add support for multitenant azure app configuration https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/howto-convert-app-to-be-multi-tenant and azure tenant id on the tenants table.
-
1
Most .net developers host there solutions on azure.
It's currently hectic to deploy abp.io app on azure, an automation script would be great.
Abp is a multi tenant application, I believe onboarding a new customer (creating a new tenant) is a manual process. Would be great to automate that. I.e a customer registers on the public portal and after approval a new tenant is created automatically.
Lastly, when hosted on azure and each customer wants to authenticate with there own azure tenant app registration how is this supposed to be configured?
New customer onboarding is currently missing
-
0
We should be able to override extensible shared components. They are extremely important to bring Company design alive in the angular app. Otherwise, at the moment, we override every component individually if we have to override. Specially
abp-extensible-table',@Component({ exportAs: 'abpExtensibleTable', selector: 'abp-extensible-table', templateUrl: './extensible-table.component.html', changeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush, }) export class ExtensibleTableComponent<R = any> implements OnChanges { protected _actionsText: string; @Input() -
0
A couple feature requests concerning Abp Suite, specifically using Blazor WebAssembly:
- With the new feature that enables an attribute to be shown or not on the grid of the page (https://support.abp.io/QA/Questions/3052/Your-feature-request#answer-3a0961dc-7f80-6a34-2349-37d908549b19) it could prove useful to be able to separate those attributes that will show up on the grid in a different DTO so that the client receives only the necessary informations, increasing performance and security.
- Following the first request, add the possibility to generate a "View" modal so that the user can view the entity in detail.
- Add the feature to create "Advanced filter" for the entity's page (this feature was already present in AspNetZero RadTool) (https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/15944)
- Trying the template system (https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/7.3/abp-suite/editing-templates) we found that in most cases it felt confusing, mostly because it is divided in many different files and it gets difficult to piece everything together, it could be useful to have a guide on how everything ties togheter or if it's not too late, consider a rework to be more similar to the AspNetZero RadTool template system
-
1
In Language Management, it is desired to add the functionality of adding Language Text. Currently, our team is also facing the following issue.
https://support.abp.io/QA/Questions/3490/Is-there-any-way-to-add-an-entry-in-language-text-manually-through-UI-without-editing-the-json-file
-
0
Forms Module:
Add more options when you want to create a form survey such as:
- upload image
- rating
- related questions based on the answer of yes /no
-
0
I have few ideas for Suite functionality
Make it possible to
- Make Suite more design friendly so its easier to rationalise over the design before creating code.
- Add description to classes and properties in the Suite UI that will then be added as comments in the code.
- View the design as a Database Schema Diagram. That way you don´t have to navigate between entities or create the code, apply migrations to a db and then view the schema...
- Ability to add more than just domain services with Suite.
- I would like to be able to easily add a service from UI to repository layer where it communicates with a 3rd party API (imagine any Azure service).
- This would come with all the needed bells and whistles needed (Polly/Refit/etc).
- No database/EF related stuff.
- Ability to add the endpoint we want to communicate with into the UI for auto discovery and code generation (e.g. for response dto´s).
- Ability to load entities from a database with their relationships (many-to-x).
I think that Suite has lot of possibilities to be a even grater tool than its now!
- Make Suite more design friendly so its easier to rationalise over the design before creating code.
-
0
Another Suite one
If you add an entity with relationship to Identity it will fail on creation because the dbContext does not have
using Volo.Abp.Identity;so need to add that and re-run the creation in Suite.It would be great if Suite could just add that using automatically.
-
1
We would like support for a Idle Session Timeout with a configurable timeout duration and a prompt to the user asking if they want to continue their session.
Appreciate your consideration.
-
0
I would like you to implement a function to separate read/write endpoints as follows.
https://support.abp.io/QA/Questions/4870/I-want-to-Separate-DB-read-and-write-endpoints _
-
0
Add the features present in AspNetZero RadTool to Abp Suite as the section "Other" where we can set "Advanced Filter", "List in UI" and "Create and Update".
And, if possible, reduce the number of template files used by Abp Suite also giving the possibility to indicate the sub-path where to save the files as it could be done in AspNetZero RadTool.
Thanks,
Robertoyes this is on the roadmap , we'll implement it.
this feature is included in ABP v7.2 release.
The Advanced Filter is still missing on the Blazor Server UI template. Do you plan that as well?
-
0
Please make these windows that contain subdomain users a popup grid or something. Its super hard and dangerous to be working with it like this
-
0
ABP Suite: Add support for json column type for property https://support.abp.io/QA/Questions/5428
-
0
https://docs.abp.io/en/commercial/latest/startup-templates/application/deployment-iis?UI=Blazor&DB=EF&Tiered=No
Write the guide for deployment on IIS also indicating how to publish Blazor WASM (frontend and backend project) from VS2022 with different environments (DEVELOP/STAGING/PRODUCTION)
Thanks
-
0
Add .editorconfig to all project/solution templates and update the code accordingly to have more consistency of code.
Like if I add this .editorconfig file, from David McCarter, to a brand new project I get over 70 errors, 400 warnings and 2200 suggestions...
There are probably lot in there that could be suppressed and not be used in this codebase but wouldn´t it be great to have some standard and help users from the start?
Update It's even much worse than that... because try to create a new vanilla solution and add some domain item and let it create code and there are default warnings in every single project.
So if I wanted to add
<TreatWarningsAsErrors>true</TreatWarningsAsErrors>to the projects I would have to do lots of extra work cleaning up these warnings (that are now error) every time I add something with Suite.Don´t you agree that for a framework this should not be like that?
-
0
Please add to Suite creation information about each project in the UI. Is the project "tired, Blazor Server, PostgreSQL etc. This will make it easier to create a the same type of project to compare and update the code. And its just smart to have this information in the Suite to begin with for many other reasons.
And add a button in the dropdown, "create new version" that creates the same type of project using the same entities but with the newest version, this makes it easier to get a new version of the code to compare when updating between versions.
-
0
Suite: Add ability to manually specify a project's ABP Version
Problem: When using Directory.Build.Props like this
to unify the abp version inside the whole project
ABP suite is not able to detect on which version my app is running on.
Suggested solution Ability to manually specify the version somewhere.
-
0
Add One-to-Many functionality to Suite (its not there today) and add something about it in the documentation please!
I even created a question on the topic to get an answer, Please make creating One-to-many relationship in Suite work!
-
0
Let Suite respect the partial keyword so we can at least create our own partial classes where our code is safe from being overridden by the tool.
Now it just deletes everything and overrides the whole class so the Suite generation fails because the partial keyword is removed.
If Suite can´t be less intrusive (pasting new code over everything) and just update the code I would personally I would like for you to implement partial design for the AppService, Managers and repository classes where people are mostly changing and updating code.
Suite is just a one-time-creation tool and that is hindering its full potentials and usefulness!
-
0
Please add Guid into the dropdown for creating a property
If I remember correctly it wasn´t there because there was some issue with Blazor but now it works fine.
Now I just update the .json file with a Guid
but it has the consequences that the value isn´t shown in edit mode..
-
0
Create a template that can be used for super cheep hosting on Azure Static Web were it can use Azure Functions to authenticate and get static data from Sqlite (or in memory read from file?).
I for example want to switch from my Ghost.org blog to that and just for my personal blog and want to use abp.io CMS Blogging capabilities.
For this I only need to log in (password can be static in the Azure Functions and the blog could come from Sqlite
-
0
I think it's about time to get all the same features of the Identity Management using Blazor or MVC. Blazor version still lacks a lot of features since a very long time:
- Drag and drop of Organisation units
- While editing a user, while in the "Roles" tab
- Having roles inherited from OU assignations suffixed with (OU) and grayed out (unclickable).
- Having roles counts in the Tab titles. E.g. Roles (2)
- While editing a user...
- What hapenedd to the Or. units tab (7.2.3 has nothing in it ?!?!)
- Display the list of OU assigned to the user.
- Display to counts of Org.Units in tab title.
Capture of Mvc...
Capture of Blazor (server)
By the way, the fact that using Blazor, we can uncheck an inherited role, save, and come back to see it's still there, can also be considered as a bug.
Thanks.
-
0
Allow form prop extensions for dynamic properties to actually be dynamic on create forms
Is there an existing issue for this?
- [X] I have searched the existing issues
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe the problem.
As a developer I want to be able to use the
recordfield inPropPredicateandPropCallbackproperties on Create forms So that I can dynamically set, for example, the disabled property based on the value of other properties that are currently set in the create formDescribe the solution you'd like
The syntax would remain identical to how it is now, only that it would actually work. It should be such that the documentation can be changed to say that the
recordfield (and others?) are available on create forms (e.g. create user). https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/UI/Angular/Dynamic-Form-ExtensionsFor example, a new extra property that I add to the form can be disabled or enabled based on whether the user has checked IsActive or not.
https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/17374
-
0
Suite: Add ability to manually specify a project's ABP Version
Problem: When using Directory.Build.Props like this
to unify the abp version inside the whole project
ABP suite is not able to detect on which version my app is running on.
Suggested solution Ability to manually specify the version somewhere.
@jfistelmann you can set the version info manually. There are also other options that you can manually edit. Just open the following file:
Windows:
%UserProfile%\.abp\suite\appsettings.jsonMAC:
~/.abp/suite/appsettings.json -
0
this problem has been addressed and will be fixed in the upcoming version
-
0
Create a template that can be used for super cheep hosting on Azure Static Web were it can use Azure Functions to authenticate and get static data from Sqlite (or in memory read from file?).
I for example want to switch from my Ghost.org blog to that and just for my personal blog and want to use abp.io CMS Blogging capabilities.
For this I only need to log in (password can be static in the Azure Functions and the blog could come from Sqlite
create a single-layer template from the open-source side. you just need to replace the authentication.
-
0
ABP Suite most wanted feature has been implemented. Your custom code will not be overwritten anymore https://commercial.abp.io/releases/pr/14629
-
0
create a single-layer template from the open-source side.you just need to replace the authentication.
And can I use the CMS module (that has the blog capabilities) with it?
-
0
ABP Suite most wanted feature has been implemented.Your custom code will not be overwritten anymorehttps://commercial.abp.io/releases/pr/14629
AWESOME to see Suit getting some love! 🦾
-
1
ABP Suite most wanted feature has been implemented. Your custom code will not be overwritten anymore https://commercial.abp.io/releases/pr/14629
This is Amazing addition to Suite. Well done ABP Team.
Can ABP team create a customisation sample for us to learn for-example adding collection/List to RootEntity, Domain Services, EFcore and Application Services and then regenerate based code
-
0
ABP Suite most wanted feature has been implemented.
Your custom code will not be overwritten anymore
https://commercial.abp.io/releases/pr/14629This is Amazing addition to Suite. Well done ABP Team.
Can ABP team create a customisation sample for us to learn for-example adding collection/List to RootEntity, Domain Services, EFcore and Application Services and then regenerate based code
Hi, we have an internal issue with creating documentation to highlight this feature. We will describe the customization process within an example.
-
0
Add the features present in AspNetZero RadTool to Abp Suite as the section "Other" where we can set "Advanced Filter", "List in UI" and "Create and Update".
And, if possible, reduce the number of template files used by Abp Suite also giving the possibility to indicate the sub-path where to save the files as it could be done in AspNetZero RadTool.
Thanks,
Robertoyes this is on the roadmap , we'll implement it.
this feature is included in ABP v7.2 release.
@alper The Advanced Filter is still missing on the Blazor WASM UI template 7.4 rc2. When will it be released? Thanks
-
0
Add the features present in AspNetZero RadTool to Abp Suite as the section "Other" where we can set "Advanced Filter", "List in UI" and "Create and Update".
And, if possible, reduce the number of template files used by Abp Suite also giving the possibility to indicate the sub-path where to save the files as it could be done in AspNetZero RadTool.
Thanks,
Robertoyes this is on the roadmap , we'll implement it.
this feature is included in ABP v7.2 release.
@alper The Advanced Filter is still missing on the Blazor WASM UI template 7.4 rc2. When will it be released? Thanks
this is implemented with 7.4.rc-2 did you update your solution?
-
0
Yes, I have updated abp suite and created a new project. There is the fix for advanced filters that were not generated before, but in abp suite there is no check box to choose which fields to use.
Maybe I didn't explain myself well. I expected to have the "Advanced Filter" checkbox in the field properties
Thanks for your patience
-
0
Yes, I have updated abp suite and created a new project. There is the fix for advanced filters that were not generated before, but in abp suite there is no check box to choose which fields to use.
Maybe I didn't explain myself well. I expected to have the "Advanced Filter" checkbox in the field properties
Thanks for your patience
Oh you mean you want to have the advanced filter optionally generated (for all UI types)
-
0
Yes, I have updated abp suite and created a new project.
There is the fix for advanced filters that were not generated before, but in abp suite there is no check box to choose which fields to use.Maybe I didn't explain myself well.
I expected to have the "Advanced Filter" checkbox in the field propertiesThanks for your patience
Oh you mean you want to have the advanced filter optionally generated (for all UI types)
Yes, like RadTool does on AspNetZero Thanks
-
0
Add Architecture Tests (e.g. NetARchTest in the templates to guide best practises.
p.s Is it possible to have the cursor in the URL field when adding a link so you can Ctrl+v after hitting the link icon (and can we also please have a Ctrl+k or Ctrl+L to get that modal open?)
-
0
There are many feature requests and question posts regarding the need for Suite to support "payload" data in many-to-many join entities.
While that feature should still be implemented as soon as possible, a useful half-measure would be to expand the new "customizable code" feature that generates partial classes and preserves modifications to the join entities generated by n:n navigation collections in Suite.
That way, we could at least attempt to add additional data fields to join entities without wiping them out on Suite regens.
