Activités de "byersjus"

There are many feature requests and question posts regarding the need for Suite to support "payload" data in many-to-many join entities.

While that feature should still be implemented as soon as possible, a useful half-measure would be to expand the new "customizable code" feature that generates partial classes and preserves modifications to the join entities generated by n:n navigation collections in Suite.

That way, we could at least attempt to add additional data fields to join entities without wiping them out on Suite regens.

There seems to be a bug when adding navigation collections (n:n) via Suite. In my case, I'm adding a navigation to a 'Tool' entity from 'ToolAssemblies' and get the following errors:

Edit: I should note this only occurs when using the 'Customizable code' option during crud page generation.

Error CS7036 There is no argument given that corresponds to the required parameter 'toolRepository' of 'ToolAssemblyManagerBase.ToolAssemblyManagerBase(IToolAssemblyRepository, IRepository<Tool, Guid>)' ToolAssemblyManager.Extended.cs

Error CS7036 There is no argument given that corresponds to the required parameter 'toolRepository' of 'ToolAssembliesAppServiceBase.ToolAssembliesAppServiceBase(IToolAssemblyRepository, ToolAssemblyManager, IDistributedCache<ToolAssemblyExcelDownloadTokenCacheItem, string>, IRepository<Tool, Guid>)' ToolAssembliesAppService.Extended.cs

That fixed it. I'm on 2.3.0-rc.1 now and no need to reload. Thanks.

You're correct, LeptonX is still at 2.2.1, and I receive the message below during abp update:

I was experiencing the issue described in #5157 in 7.2.2.

@maliming mentioned it was fixed in the next version so I updated to 7.3.0-rc.1, but I'm still getting it.

I understand that what I originally asked essentially amounted to a feature request, and I've now seen (and upvoted) the requests for these features in #3052, but what I need today is some direction on moving forward without the features. Is there a sample somewhere of a many-to-many relationship with "payload" added in ABP? I've read the Microsoft Documentation on the subject, but I'm trying to marry that with the ABP Suite workflow and hopefully end up with code that is compatible with how you intend to implement the partial class / "code updater" discussed here.

Maybe point me to the internal feature issue that was created to persist CRUD customizations through regenerations? At least I can try to manually mimic that technique.

Thanks for the response.

I expected to hear suite is not capable because I couldn't find the feature, but I would disagree that this is a special case; in my experience this is a pretty common scenario.

Either way, you suggested using EF's method of implementation instead of Object Extensions. Can you point to an example or documentation?

Using EF's method, is it still possible to use suite to maintain the primary entities (parts and assemblies in my case)? Or, do I have to abandon suite altogether to avoid overwriting changes?

Description Abp suite v7.2.0-rc.2 throws the following exception: Could not find the bundle file '/libs/abp/core/abp.css' for the bundle 'Lepton.Global'!

Reproduction Steps abp suite update --version 7.2.0-rc.2 abp suite

Expected behavior abp suite runs

Actual behavior abp suite throws exception and does not load

Regression? 7.1.1 works

Version 7.2.0-rc.2

User Interface Blazor Server

Database Provider EF Core (Default)

Other Very similar to GitHub issue #16303