Activities of "raif"

Is there any posibility that we can add attribute which prevents serialization of property ? How can i remove attribute from property ?

public static class NMMApplicationContractsExtensionConfigurator
{
    private static readonly OneTimeRunner OneTimeRunner = new OneTimeRunner();

    public static void Configure()
    {
        OneTimeRunner.Run(() =>
        {
            ConfigureProperties();
        });
    }
    
    private static void ConfigureProperties()
    {
        ObjectExtensionManager.Instance.AddOrUpdateProperty<SaasTenantCreateDto, string>("AdminEmailAddress",
             options =>
             {
                 options.Attributes.Add(new System.Text.Json.Serialization.JsonIgnoreAttribute());
                 options.Attributes.Remove(new StringLengthAttribute(256));
                 options.Attributes.Add(new StringLengthAttribute(3)
                 {
                     MinimumLength = 1
                 }
             );
        });
     }
}

Definition done at PreConfigure step

public override void PreConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
    NMMApplicationContractsExtensionConfigurator.Configure();
} 

However, still able to pass validation, that means i couldn't change DTO properties

• ABP Framework version: v4.2.1
• UI type: MVC
• DB provider: EF Core
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes

https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Customizing-Application-Modules-Overriding-Services

Hello, I want to override the method in the application service which in a seperate module.

using Volo.Saas.Editions;
using Volo.Saas.Host.Dtos;
using Volo.Saas.Tenants;

namespace Volo.Saas.Host
{
    [Authorize(SaasHostPermissions.Tenants.Default)]
    public class TenantAppService : SaasHostAppServiceBase, ITenantAppService
    {
        public TenantAppService(.........
        )

        [Authorize(SaasHostPermissions.Tenants.Create)]
        public virtual async Task<SaasTenantDto> CreateAsync(SaasTenantCreateDto input)
        {
        }
    }
}

I'm just targeting to override CreateAsync in my solution

[Dependency(ReplaceServices = true)]
[ExposeServices(typeof(ITenantAppService), typeof(TenantAppService), typeof(NMMTenantAppService))]
public class NMMTenantAppService : TenantAppService
{
    public NMMTenantAppService(
        IEditionRepository editionRepository, 
        ITenantRepository tenantRepository, 
        ITenantManager tenantManager, 
        IDataSeeder dataSeeder)
        : base(
              tenantRepository: tenantRepository, 
              editionRepository: editionRepository, 
              tenantManager: tenantManager, 
              dataSeeder: dataSeeder)
    {

    }

    public async override Task<SaasTenantDto> CreateAsync(SaasTenantCreateDto input)
    {
        var tenant = await TenantManager.CreateAsync(input.Name, input.EditionId);
        input.MapExtraPropertiesTo(tenant);
        await TenantRepository.InsertAsync(tenant);

        await CurrentUnitOfWork.SaveChangesAsync();

        return ObjectMapper.Map<Tenant, SaasTenantDto>(tenant);
    }
}

Beside that I'm also not happy with** SaasTenantCreateDto**. Tricky part is I don't want to extend DTO, I want to remove properties What is the recommended way to do this in framework ?

Do I need create a new ApplicationService in my project with new interface ? And replace service from module with a new one

App Service

[Authorize(SaasHostPermissions.Tenants.Default)]
public class NMMTenantAppService : SaasHostAppServiceBase, INMMTenantAppService
{
}

Method

[Authorize(SaasHostPermissions.Tenants.Create)]
public async Task<SaasTenantDto> CreateAsync(**NMMSaasTenantCreateDto** input)
{

}

Interface

public interface INMMTenantAppService : ICrudAppService<SaasTenantDto, Guid, GetTenantsInput, **NMMSaasTenantCreateDto**, SaasTenantUpdateDto>
{

}

Dto

public class NMMSaasTenantCreateDto : SaasTenantCreateOrUpdateDtoBase
{
}

Thx, Missed one of the underscore,

HeaderTenantResolveContributor: Tries to find current tenant id from HTTP headers. The header name is __tenant by default.

Hi, I have created a separate database for each tenant in order to provide data isolation between host and tenant in my system. Migration operation is performed over different contextes

Host is

    /* Include modules to your migration db context */
    builder.ConfigurePermissionManagement();
    builder.ConfigureSettingManagement();
    builder.ConfigureBackgroundJobs();
    builder.ConfigureAuditLogging();
    builder.ConfigureIdentity();
    builder.ConfigureIdentityServer();
    builder.ConfigureFeatureManagement();
    builder.ConfigureLanguageManagement();
    builder.ConfigureSaas();
    builder.ConfigureTextTemplateManagement();
    builder.ConfigureBlobStoring();
    /* Custom platform modules */         
    builder.ConfigureCredit();
    /* Configure your own tables/entities inside the ConfigureNMM method */
    builder.ConfigureNMM();

Tenat is

    builder.ConfigurePermissionManagement();
    builder.ConfigureSettingManagement();
    builder.ConfigureAuditLogging();
    builder.ConfigureIdentity();
    builder.ConfigureFeatureManagement();
    builder.ConfigureLanguageManagement();
    builder.ConfigureTextTemplateManagement();

As you can see from above we didn't create any identityServer4 related table at tenant side since it is host related task

As far as i can see out of box app client supports password grant flow

   CreateClientAsync(
    name: consoleAndAngularClientId,
    scopes: commonScopes,
    grantTypes: new[] { "password", "client_credentials", "authorization_code" },
    secret: (configurationSection["XYZ_App:ClientSecret"] ?? "1q2w3e*").Sha256(),
    requireClientSecret: ~~false~~ true,
    redirectUri: webClientRootUrl,
    postLogoutRedirectUri: webClientRootUrl,
~~corsOrigins: new[] { webClientRootUrl.RemovePostFix("/") ~~

Ofcourse, there is no problem for the host users

However tenant users are not able get token for the API calls, Any hint ?

• ABP Framework version: v4.2.1
• UI type: MVC
• DB provider: EF Core
• Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes
• Exception message and stack trace:
• Steps to reproduce the issue: